Search published articles
Volume 2, Issue 2 (9-2015)
Background and Aim: These days, Internet and online databases play a significant role in peoples’ information-seeking behavior, especially for postgraduate students. The kind of behavior seen on the part of those students who get help from online databases to write their theses might be completely different from those who search library sources to get the needed information. This study investigates the information-seeking behavior of postgraduate students of Kharazmi University who are writing their theses.
Method: This study used both qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection. Quantitative data were gathered using an information-seeking behavior questionnaire, which was then, analyzed using statistical analysis (T-Test and Friedman-Test). Content analysis and semi-structured interviews were used to analyze qualitative data. The participants were 100 students including 50 male and 50 female students.
Results: Results of analyzing the T-Test for male and female groups showed that there is not any significant difference of girls' and boys' information-seeking behavior. Results of analyzing the Friedman-Test however showed difference in average ratings of information-seeking behavior dimensions. With regard to results obtained from this analysis: pre-existing knowledge confirmation, relevancy judgments, bringing up new thoughts, time and effort for searching information contain maximum to minimum rates in a respective manner. Results of the qualitative data also showed that: most of the students’ problems lie in: seeking for and using the collaborative behavior and collaborative searching, difficulty in finding the related information, language limitations, diversity of goals, limitations the forms of the sources, unfamiliarity with the specific sources, lack of information literacy, and spending so much time to search.
Conclusion: Findings obtained in this study showed that postgraduate students do not have the skills and knowledge needed for using online data. This also indicates their deficiency and lack of information seeking and information literacy skills. So, recognizing the obstacles on the way of knowing and using these online databases and training students for purposeful searching seem to be essential.
Volume 2, Issue 4 (3-2016)
Background and Aim: Gaining appropriate information service primarily depends on the information needs and users' information seeking conducts. Students' mental health requires gratification in their information needs. Present study makes an attempt to investigate the information conduct of student clienteles at counseling center.
Method: Current study employs a quantitative descriptive method. The population of the current study is composed of all student clienteles at Kharazmi University counseling center. Available sampling method was used. Researcher's made questionnaire was applied for collecting the data and questionnaires were distributed amongst 145 student clienteles.
Results: Findings identified students: information needs, motivation for searching information, required information sources for searching students mental health, first source of reference to counseling centers, and assessment and viewpoints on the quality of services at counseling centers.
Conclusion: the findings of this study confirms the vital role of investigating the information seeking behavior of students coming to counseling centers as a suitable source for identifying students mental health which could lead to better planning and services in counseling centers.
Volume 3, Issue 2 (9-2016)
Background and Aim: In effect, every scientific endeavor consisted of scientific communication and scientists’ involvement in particular field of study; and scientific board members as the most outstanding elements play a key role in scientific productions. Therefore, a constructive scientific communication requires obtaining credible and valid information. In so doing, this study tries to investigate the valid indicies in scientific communication (reading and citing) from Kharazmi University faculty members’ points of view.
Methods: The study is a descriptive survery. The population included faculty members of Kharazmi University. Self-selected sampling was used. In other words, the questionnaires were given to all faculty members, some participated and some did not. Totally 130 questionnaires were collected. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire with a confirmed relibility and validity. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.20.
Results: According to the results, the main credibility criteria used by researchers for reading an item were: topical relevance and validity of content and soundness of author's logic and arguments in paper. The main credibility criteria for citing an item include validity of content, topical relevance, and validity of data used in the paper. The main credibility criteria for using open access sources were peer reviewed quality of the content, and the reputation of authors. Quality of content is an important criterion both for reading and citing an item.
Conclusion: With respect to findings, it can be said that faculty memebers evaluate the credibility of information in both study and in citing mostly on the basis of meaning of information. For open access materials, peer-reviewing and content were important. Thus, it is recommended that the all stakeholders and the persons involved in the scientific comunication system, set the quality control in proiority.
Volume 3, Issue 4 (3-2017)
Background and Aim: The present study has been done in order to survey contextualized information retrieval behavior by the students of Kharazmi University.
Methods: This is descriptive applied research. Statistical population includes all the students currently studying at the Kharazmi University in the time of research. Sample of research includes 196 students selected by convenience sampling method. In order to collect information a researcher-designed questionnaire was used. The questionnaire’s reliability was 6.82 and its validity was confirmed some university professors. For analyzing data, One- sample T- test and independent samples T test were used.
Results: Results showed that the main efficient factor in information retrieval behavior of students was computer sites of the university. Students obtained their required scientific information through Internet resources via search engines. Their main aim in seeking scientific information was doing their assignments. Students primary aim of seeking scientific information was to collect educational information followed by research information.
Conclusion: The main impediment and problem on the way of information seeking at the university was low internet speed. Also, there was no significant differences between demographic factors (gender, marital status and resident’s status) and information retrieval behavior of students. Only in some research variables we found significant differences.
Keywords: Information retrieval behavior, Context, Students, Kharazmi University.
Volume 8, Issue 1 (5-2021)
Background: The performance and collaboration of universities could be measured through scientific publications and scientometrics indicators. The purpose is to describe state of scientific publications at Kharazmi University and determine the important players of the Co-authorship networks at this University in three levels: Researchers, organizations and countries - in the web of science from 1994 to 2020.
Method: This is a scientometrics study. Kharazmi University’s’ 4734 records from Web of Science both text and Excel format had been extracted. Data visualization was performed using VOSviewer and the GunnMap.
Finding: Results showed that Kharazmi University publications have received an average of 10.68 citations with H-index of 75. The five first subject areas are engineering, chemistry, physics, mathematics, and computer science. For scientific co-authorship among Iranian organizations, Islamic Azad, Tehran, Tarbiat Modares Universities; among foreign organizations, Putra University, Malaysia, California and Montreal; Among countries, United States, Canada and the United Kingdom are ranked first to third. Vatanpour, Majlesara Jahromi, and Divsalar are the top three researcher. Vatanpour is most effective researcher quantitatively and qualitatively. Fields of chemistry (organic and polymer / decomposition and application), biology, industrial engineering and engineering make main authors' of co-authorship network. Main players in the organization network are Iranian organizations, and more in Tehran. Although Kharazmi University cooperation with other countries is not acceptable, but the drawing of the co-authorship network of countries shows that cooperation is developing at the international level. Also, scientific co-authorship with Iranian organizations, especially foreign organizations, has increased the citation of Kharazmi University publication.
Conclusion: Kharazmi University publications had been growing significantly on the web of science database in recent years in term of quantity and quality. More scientific teamwork is suggested for Kharazmi University at the international level. Also, publication of topmost thesis and dissertations on the Web of Science should be considered.
Volume 11, Issue 3 (12-2024)
Method: This research is practical in terms of its objective and descriptive-survey in terms of method. A quantitative approach was used to collect data. The statistical population consisted of postgraduate students at Kharazmi University. The sample size was 536 postgraduate students, and stratified random sampling was used. A standardized researcher-made questionnaire was used for data collection. The main structure of the questionnaire is based on the HELAM model, along with an additional “overall satisfaction” factor, which was adapted and translated using specialized literature and relevant research. For data analysis, various statistical tests including one-sample t-test and one-way ANOVA in SPSS, and confirmatory factor analysis in R software were used.
Findings: The results indicated that the status of Kharazmi University’s e-learning program, evaluated using the HELAM conceptual model and its seven aspects (student attitude, instructor attitude, system quality, content quality, service quality, support issues, and overall satisfaction), is significantly above the community average with over 99% confidence. Moreover, the support issues aspect showed a significant difference compared to other dimensions, followed by content quality and service quality, which are close to each other and separated from other sub-scales, while system quality, instructor attitude, overall satisfaction, and student attitude have the lowest mean rankings.
Conclusion: Managers and experts at the Information and Communication Technology Center of Kharazmi University should take measures to improve system quality, instructor attitude, overall satisfaction, and student attitude aspects to enhance their performance in parallel with support issues.
Volume 12, Issue 3 (12-2025)
Method: The study used a mixed-methods approach. The participants included 36 doctoral students from the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences at Kharazmi University during the 2024–2025 academic year, selected through purposive sampling. An initial questionnaire and a comparative questionnaire were used, and the students evaluated the relevant indicators after direct interaction with both models. In the qualitative phase, think-aloud protocols, semi-structured interviews, and observation of the interaction process using Morae software were employed. Quantitative data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while qualitative data were analyzed through coding in MAXQDA.
Findings: The findings showed that the superiority of the two models does not follow a uniform pattern. ChatGPT-4 was rated significantly higher in overall performance, and users found it more effective in initiating searches, organizing interaction, formulating the initial problem, and enhancing information-seeking confidence. In contrast, Gemini 2.5 Pro showed significant superiority in the accuracy of scientific and specialized responses, the diversity of information, the coverage of different aspects of the topic, and the practical usefulness of responses. No significant difference was found between the two models in terms of comprehensibility. The qualitative findings also indicated that Gemini 2.5 Pro was more strongly associated with content depth, comprehensiveness, and support for research work, whereas ChatGPT-4 was mainly described in terms of conversational fluency, response organization, and user reassurance.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the two models are complementary tools. ChatGPT-4 is better suited to initiating searches and organizing users’ thinking, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is more useful for specialized, research-oriented questions. However, neither model can replace academic databases, expert judgment, or the researcher’s critical evaluation.
| Page 1 from 1 |
Related Websites
Site Keywords
نشریه, Academic Journal, Scientific Article, کلمه شماره یک, کلمه شماره یک, کلمه شماره یک, کلمه شماره یک, کلمه شماره دو, کلمه شماره یک, کلمه دوVote
© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Human Information Interaction
Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb